Blackwelder v. Bank of America, N.A.
L'Don Blackwelder |
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A and Bank of America, N.A. |
7:2018cv00300 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Ricardo H Hinojosa |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 DEFENDANT'S SECOND AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiff's Original Petition Consenting the Right to Foreclose, Declare Lien Void, and for Damages by Bank of America, N.A., filed. (NelidaLosoya, 7) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Motion for Leave to File.(Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(NelidaLosoya, 7) |
Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer to Plaintiffs Original Petition Contesting the Right to Foreclose, Declare Lien Void, and for Damages by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 20 DEFENDANT'S AMENDED ANSWER to PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, by Bank of America, N.A., filed. (klopez, 7) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion for Leave to File. (Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) |
Filing 18 *Amended Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File To File Defendant's First Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Original Petition Contesting the Right to Foreclose, Declare Lien Void, and for Damages by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Sheppard, Branch) *Modified on 11/6/2018 (klopez, 7). |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's First Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Original Petition Contesting the Right to Foreclose, Declare Lien Void, and for Damages by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 16 AMENDED ANSWER to by Bank of America, N.A., filed. (Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 15 ORDER Striking Document re: #11 MOTION for Leave to File to File Defendant's Frist Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Original Petition Contesting the Right to Foreclose Declare Lien Void, and For Damages. (Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified. (NelidaLosoya, 7) |
Filing 14 ORDER Striking Document re: #10 Amended Answer. (Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified. (NelidaLosoya, 7) |
Filing 13 RULE 16, F.R.C.P. SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 3/2/2019. Motions for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery due by 01/31/2019. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 3/12/2019. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 3/12/2019. Joinder of Parties due by 3/12/2019. Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/28/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 4/4/2019 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa(Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(NelidaLosoya, 7) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Chris Tamez to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2018: #1 Supplement) (NelidaLosoya, 7). |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's Frist Amended Answer #10 to Plaintiff's Original Petition Contesting the Right to Foreclose Declare Lien Void, and For Damages by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sheppard, Branch) Modified on 11/2/2018 (pyebernetsky, 4). |
Filing 10 AMENDED ANSWER to by Bank of America, N.A., filed. (Sheppard, Branch) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa. INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 11/2/2018. Case called on the docket. All parties present. Defense counsel Mr. Tamez urged #9 Motion for Chris Tamez to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Without any objections, the Court granted. No pending motions. The Court issued a Docket Control Order (4 months). Appearances: Christopher M Tamez, John Robert King.(ERO:Tony Tijerina (2:42-2:45), filed.(adelagarza, 7) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Chris Tamez to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/23/2018. (Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 8 ORDER Striking Document re: #7 Initial Disclosures (Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) |
Filing 7 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 6 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN , filed.(Sheppard, Branch) Modified on 10/22/2018 (AdrianDeLaRosa, 7). |
ORAL ORDER Denying #4 Defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone. (by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(adelagarza, 7) |
Filing 5 Unopposed RESPONSE to #4 MOTION Defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone filed by L'Don Blackwelder. (King, John) |
Filing 4 MOTION Defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/6/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Sheppard, Branch) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/2/2018 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa(by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 275th District Court of Hildalgo County, Texas, case number C-1275-18-E (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20937487) filed by BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Appendix, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sheppard, Branch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.