Azua et al v. Aguirre et al
| Stephanie Esparza and Beatriz Azua |
| Santiago Aguirre and International Crossing Freight LLC |
| 7:2018cv00351 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Micaela Alvarez |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 Joint MOTION to Dismiss (Motion Hearing set for 1/15/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez) (Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by Santiago Aguirre, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss)(Hunter, James) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION by Santiago Aguirre, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Extending Time to Respond)(Hunter, James) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/15/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez (by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 332nd District Court, case number C-3742-18-F (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21271575) filed by International Crossing Freight LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Hunter, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
