Alonzo Cantu Construction, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
Plaintiff: Alonzo Cantu Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America
Case Number: 7:2019cv00185
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Randy Crane
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Panasonic Corporation of North America, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order)(Calvillo, David)
July 12, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE to #7 Opposed MOTION to Remand filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Calvillo, David)
June 24, 2019 Filing 7 Opposed MOTION to Remand by Alonzo Cantu Construction, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Remand)(Hole, Ronald)
June 7, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Initial Conference reset for 8/7/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane(Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(NelidaLosoya, 7)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/3/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane(by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Micaela Alvarez recused. Case reassigned to Judge Randy Crane for all further proceedings, Deadlines terminated(Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/16/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez(by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(NelidaLosoya, 7)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa recused. Case reassigned to Judge Micaela Alvarez for all further proceedings(Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(NelidaLosoya, 7)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 389th District Court, case number C-1628-19-H (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22525267) filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1, #3 Exhibit B-2, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Calvillo, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alonzo Cantu Construction, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America
Represented By: David N Calvillo
Represented By: David M. Medina
Represented By: Reagan H Gibbs, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alonzo Cantu Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Ronald Glen Hole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?