Alvarez v. Gonzalez et al
Melanie S. Alvarez |
Yadira Gonzalez Rangel dba Leos Autotransportes de Carga and Jose Angel Quintero Gonzalez |
7:2019cv00422 |
December 23, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Randy Crane |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Randy Crane. INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 2/5/2020. Case called on docket. Parties present. Status of case discussed. The Court issued a scheduling order, copies tendered to counsel, reflecting an October 2020 jury trial date. Appearances: Joe Escobedo, Plaintiff; Chaz Daniel Klaes, Defendant.(ERO: Ricardo Rodriguez), filed.(DeliaRodriguez, 7) |
Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Jose Angel Quintero Gonzalez, Yadira Gonzalez Rangel dba Leos Autotransportes de Carga, filed.(Klaes, Chaz) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Melanie S. Alvarez, filed.(Cardenas, Luis) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jose Angel Quintero Gonzalez, Yadira Gonzalez Rangel dba Leos Autotransportes de Carga, filed.(Klaes, Chaz) |
![]() |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23821775) filed by Yadira Gonzalez Rangel dba Leos Autotransportes de Carga, Jose Angel Quintero Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Klaes, Chaz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.