Pacific Western Bank v. Saenz
| Pacific Western Bank |
| Maximo R. Saenz |
| 7:2020cv00093 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Randy Crane |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendant's deadline to respond is extended to 06/08/2020. (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION re: Defendant Saenz Deadline to Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Maximo R. Saenz, filed.(Escobar, Carlos) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Pacific Western Bank, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Proposed Order)(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Maximo R. Saenz, filed.(Escobar, Carlos) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Pacific Western Bank, filed.(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Pacific Western Bank, filed.(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 9 Other EXHIBITS re: #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Maximo R. Saenz, filed.(Escobar, Carlos) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Maximo R. Saenz filed by Pacific Western Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-K to the Amended Complaint)(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Pacific Western Bank. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Proposed Order)(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Maximo R. Saenz, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Escobar, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Maximo R. Saenz served on 4/2/2020, answer due 4/23/2020, filed.(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Maximo R. Saenz. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferNogueira, 7) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/3/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane(by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Maximo R. Saenz, filed.(Schulte, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maximo R. Saenz (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24502757) filed by Pacific Western Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schulte, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pacific Western Bank v. Saenz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maximo R. Saenz | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Omar Escobar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pacific Western Bank | |
| Represented By: | David C. Schulte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
