Garza v. Blinken et al
Damaris Giselle Garza |
Secretary Antony J. Blinken, U.S. Department of State, US Attorney General Merrick B Garland and US Attorney Southern District of Texas |
7:2021cv00070 |
February 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Micaela Alvarez |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to US Attorney Southern District of Texas served on 3/23/2021, answer due 5/24/2021, filed.(Maldonado, Javier) |
Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Antony J. Blinken served on 4/2/2021, answer due 6/1/2021, filed.(Maldonado, Javier) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Merrick B Garland served on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021, filed.(Maldonado, Javier) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferNogueira, 7) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Plaintiffs, filed.(Maldonado, Javier) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Damaris Giselle Garza, filed.(Maldonado, Javier) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of State (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26004701) filed by Damaris Giselle Garza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, Javier) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.