Munoz v. Renaud et al
| Gilberto Munoz Jr |
| Norma Limon, Tracy Renaud and Merrick B. Garland |
| 7:2021cv00250 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Randy Crane |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Gilberto Munoz Jr, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff via: ECF, filed.(klopez, 7) |
| Filing 6 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Gilberto Munoz Jr, filed.(Matulewicz, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gilberto Munoz Jr, filed.(Matulewicz, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferNogueira, 7) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Gilberto Munoz Jr, filed.(Matulewicz, Anthony) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/9/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane(by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26633361) filed by Gilberto Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Matulewicz, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
