Ramirez v. Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD et al
| Yessenia Ramirez |
| Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD and Juan C Garza |
| 7:2021cv00343 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Randy Crane |
| P.I.: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT re: #11 Motion for Leave to File Document, filed by Yessenia Ramirez.(Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(SandraSilva, 7)
|
| Filing 14 PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD filed by Yessenia Ramirez. Related document: #10 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. filed by Yessenia Ramirez, #1 Complaint filed by Yessenia Ramirez.(SandraSilva, 7) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT granting #12 Amended MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(SandraSilva, 7)
|
| Filing 12 Amended MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Yessenia Ramirez, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint)(Rushing, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Yessenia Ramirez, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint)(Rushing, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD filed by Yessenia Ramirez. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Yessenia Ramirez.(SandraSilva, 7) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT denying as moot #7 MOTION to Dismiss, granting #8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Juan C Garza terminated.(Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(SandraSilva, 7)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Yessenia Ramirez, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint)(Rushing, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(1) AND 12(B)(6) by Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/3/2021. (Campbell, David) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Juan C Garza served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021, filed.(Rushing, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021, filed.(Rushing, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferNogueira, 7) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Rushing, Stephen) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/8/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane(by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27049783) filed by Yessenia Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rushing, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
