Flores et al v. Cornejo et al
Plaintiff: Celina Flores and Noe Everardo Flores
Defendant: Alfredo Cornejo and Cornejo Forestry Services, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2021cv00348
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Micaela Alvarez
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF REMAND re #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand. Case terminated on 11/10/21(Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
November 4, 2021 Filing 7 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Alfredo Cornejo, Cornejo Forestry Services, Inc., filed.(Macias, Mark)
October 15, 2021 Filing 6 Opposed PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND re: #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand, filed.(Garza, Francisco)
October 15, 2021 Filing 5 Opposed MOTION to Remand by Celina Flores, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Francisco J. Garza, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Filed stamped copy of served Citation for Defendant, Alfredo Cornejo, #4 Exhibit Governmental Public records of Hidalgo County Appraisal District records for Defendant, Alfredo Cornejo, #5 Exhibit Governmental Public Records, Deed Record for Defendant, Alfredo Cornejo, #6 Exhibit Governmental Public Records, Designation of Homestead and Affidavit of Non-Homestead for Defendant, Alfredo Cornejo)(Garza, Francisco)
October 1, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Celina Flores, filed.(Garza, Francisco)
October 1, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Alfredo Cornejo, Cornejo Forestry Services, Inc., filed.(Macias, Mark)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/16/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez(by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores et al v. Cornejo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celina Flores
Represented By: Francisco Javier Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noe Everardo Flores
Represented By: Francisco Javier Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alfredo Cornejo
Represented By: Brian Alan Metcalf
Represented By: Mark E. Macias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cornejo Forestry Services, Inc.
Represented By: Brian Alan Metcalf
Represented By: Mark E. Macias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?