RANGEL DE CAMPOS v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
| BLANCA E. RANGEL DE CAMPOS |
| SAM'S EAST, INC. |
| 7:2021cv00458 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Randy Crane |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 5/13/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 5/13/2022. Pltf Expert Report due by 6/3/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 6/17/2022. Discovery due by 7/8/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/22/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/22/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/29/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Randy Crane. Jury Selection set for 9/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Randy Crane. (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(kanelson, 7)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Randy Crane. INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 1/5/2022. Status of case discussed. No pending motions. The Court will issue a scheduling order reflecting a September 2022 jury trial. Appearances: Michael J. Cisneros, Plaintiff; Elizabeth Ferguson Herrera, Defendant. (ERO:Ricardo Rodriguez), filed.(DeliaRodriguez, 7) |
| Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by SAM'S EAST, INC., filed.(Herrera, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by SAM'S EAST, INC., filed.(Herrera, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by BLANCA E. RANGEL DE CAMPOS, filed.(Cisneros, Michael) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/5/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane (by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 139th District Court, Hidalgo County, Texas, case number C-3827-21-C (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27404470) filed by SAM'S EAST, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Served Citation, #4 Exhibit Defendant's Original Answer, #5 Exhibit Notice of Removal (State Court), #6 Exhibit Counsel List, #7 Exhibit Index of All Documents, #8 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Saenz, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RANGEL DE CAMPOS v. SAM'S EAST, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BLANCA E. RANGEL DE CAMPOS | |
| Represented By: | Michael J Cisneros |
| Represented By: | Arturo Cisneros |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SAM'S EAST, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jaime Arturo Saenz |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Ferguson Herrera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
