Hernandez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
| Geovani Hernandez |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Unknown Supervisor-Agent |
| 7:2023cv00059 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Micaela Alvarez |
| Randy Crane |
| Nadia S Medrano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 03/13/23 (Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER, Case Reassigned to Judge Micaela Alvarez. Chief Judge Randy Crane no longer assigned to the case (Signed by Chief Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Juan F Alanis recused. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Juan F Alanis) Parties notified.(cvillegas, 7)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Geovani Hernandez, filed. (klopez, 7) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Geovani Hernandez, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/6/2023. (klopez, 7) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Geovani Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(klopez, 7) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
