Alanis v. Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
| David Alanis |
| Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas |
| 7:2023cv00079 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Ricardo H Hinojosa |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
AMENDED ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/13/2023 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa. (by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(KathrynNelson, 7)
|
ORAL ORDER granting #7 Joint Motion to Appear for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference via Zoom. (by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(KathrynNelson, 7)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Eric K. Bowers to Appear *via zoom by Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bowers, Eric) *Modified on 4/19/2023 (klopez, 7). |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Continuance)(Bowers, Eric) |
Filing 5
AMENDED ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/15/2023 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa (by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(klopez, 7)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David Alanis, filed.(Quiroz, Eric) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, filed.(Bowers, Eric) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/8/2023 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa(by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 398th Judicial District Court, Hidalgo County, case number C-3005-22-I (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29559088) filed by Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B-1, #4 Exhibit B-2, #5 Exhibit B-3, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G)(Bowers, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alanis v. Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Alanis | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Edwin Pennebaker |
| Represented By: | Eric Anthony Quiroz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas | |
| Represented By: | Eric Kent Bowers |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lee Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.