Lopez et al v. General Motors
Deciderio Lopez and Elva Sanchez |
General Motors |
7:2023cv00240 |
July 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Ricardo H Hinojosa |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with N by General Motors, filed.(Beatty, Matthew) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To File Answer by General Motors, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beatty, Matthew) |
Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to General Motors served on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to General Motors. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(KarenLLopez, 7) |
![]() |
Filing 4 APPENDIX re: #1 Complaint by Deciderio Lopez, Elva Sanchez, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Deciderio Lopez, Elva Sanchez, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Deciderio Lopez, Elva Sanchez, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Motors (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30263089) filed by Deciderio Lopez, Elva Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Kimmel, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.