Agbese et al v. University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
| Aje-Ori Agbese, Minhee Eom and Wan-Lin Chang |
| University of Texas Rio Grande Valley |
| 7:2025cv00239 |
| May 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Randy Crane |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. (Arroyo, Martin)
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE in Opposition to #9 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Aje-Ori Agbese, Wan-Lin Chang, Minhee Eom. (Klein, Stefanie)
|
Filing 10
DESIGNATION of Martin Arroyo Jr. as attorney in charge of University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Arroyo, Martin)
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss by University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/8/2025. (Dolcefino, Anthony)
|
Filing 8
RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 12/12/2025. Joinder of Parties due by 12/12/2025 Pltf Expert Report due by 1/2/2026. Deft Expert Report due by 1/16/2026. Discovery due by 2/6/2026. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 2/20/2026. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 2/20/2026. Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/30/2026. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/6/2026 at 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Randy Crane Jury Selection set for 4/7/2026 at 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Randy Crane Motion Hearing set for 3/19/2026 at 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Randy Crane (Signed by Chief Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified. (kll7)
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Randy Crane. INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 8/5/2025. Case called on docket. Parties present. No pending motions. The Court will issue a Scheduling Order reflecting an April 2026 jury trial date. Appearances: Stefanie Martin Klein, Plaintiff; Anthony Dolcefino, Defendant. (ERO:Jennifer Nogueira), filed. (dsr7)
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Aje-Ori Agbese, Wan-Lin Chang, Minhee Eom, filed. (Hill, Frank)
|
Filing 6
JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Aje-Ori Agbese, Wan-Lin Chang, Minhee Eom, filed. (Hill, Frank)
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to University of Texas Rio Grande Valley served on 6/18/2025, answer due 8/18/2025, filed. (Hill, Frank)
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Frank Hill on behalf of Aje-Ori Agbese, Wan-Lin Chang, Minhee Eom, filed. (Hill, Frank)
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/5/2025 at 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Randy Crane (by Chief Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified. (jen7)
|
Filing 2
CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (jen7)
|
Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge J. Scott Hacker randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (jen7)
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-33459487) filed by Aje-Ori Agbese, Wan-Lin Chang, Minhee Eom. (Klein, Stefanie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.