(Minor) v. Agudelo et al
| L.F.A.C. (Minor) |
| Juan Agudelo, DIRECTOR DAVID VENTURELLA, MARKWAYNE MULLIN and U.S Attorney General Todd Blanche |
| Juan Pinon |
| 7:2026cv00417 |
| September 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John GE Marck |
| Nadia S Medrano |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2243 AND REQUIRING GOVERNMENT RESPONSE (Signed by Magistrate Judge Nadia S Medrano) Parties notified. (sas7)
|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (kll7) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36813551) filed by L.F.A.C. (Minor). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Birth Certificate, #2 Exhibit B. Texas ID) (Garcia, Carlos) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Nadia S. Medrano randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (kll7) |
| NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric Joel Drootman on behalf of Juan Agudelo, Todd Blanche, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, DAVID VENTURELLA, filed. (Drootman, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.