GONZALEZ v. USCIS et al
| LIVAN MACHADO GONZALEZ |
| USCIS, NATIONAL BENEFITS CENTER,ROSE M. KENDRICK, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) DIRECTOR, JOSEPH B. ELBOW, SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR MARKWAYNE MULLIN and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, TODD BLANCHE |
| 7:2026cv00424 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John GE Marck |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (kll7) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Nadia S. Medrano randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (kll7) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Writ MANDAMUS by LIVAN MACHADO GONZALEZ, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF THROUGH WRIT OF MANDAMUS, #2 Exhibit WRIT OF MANDAMUS ATTACHMENTS) (Rivera, Ismael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
