Hatch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Conny B. Hatch, III |
Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated |
1:2005cv00074 |
February 3, 2005 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Austin Office |
Sam Sparks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 Appeal Record Returned from USCA: #30 Notice of Appeal (mc2, ) |
Filing 37 Certified copy of USCA JUDGMENT/MANDATE affirming #30 Notice of Appeal filed by Conny B. Hatch, III and plaintiff pay defendant costs on appeal to be taxed by clerk of this Court. (mc2, ) |
Filing 36 Receipt for Transmittal of Record on Appeal. (jk, ) |
Filing 35 Certified and Hand Delivered Record on Appeal to Conny B. Hatch, III. re #30 Notice of Appeal (jk, ) |
Filing 34 Plaintiff filed request for ROA. (jk, ) |
Certified record on appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: appeal [30-1]. ROA maintained in District Clerk's office. (jk) |
Filing 33 Transcript filed appeal [30-1] for dates of 12/15/05 (Proceedings Transcribed: Hearing) (Court Reporter: Sandra Graf) (jk) |
Filing 32 Appeal Transcript requested by Conny B. Hatch III appeal [30-1] for dates of 12/15/05 (Proceedings Transcribed: Hearing) (Court Reporter: Sandra Graf) (jk) |
Filing 31 Bill of costs filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (jk) |
Notice of appeal and certified copy of docket to USCA: appeal [30-1] (jk) |
USCA appeal fees paid for appeal [30-1] : Appeal Fee: $ 255.00 Receipt # 384505 (jk) |
Filing 30 Notice of appeal by Conny B. Hatch III (jk) |
Filing 29 Judgment, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that plaintiff Conny B. Hatch III take nothing in this cause against defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and that all costs of suit are taxed against plaintiff, for which let execution issue. signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (Pages: 1) (dm) |
Filing 28 Order granting motion for final summary judgment with memorandum of law in support [21-1] signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Case closed (dm) |
Filing 27 Order resetting status conference for 1:30 2/17/06 signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (mc2) |
Filing 26 Order set status conference at 9:00 3/3/06 signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 25 Reply Memorandum by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc in support of motion for final summary judgment with memorandum of law in support [21-1] (dm) |
Filing 24 Order granting motion to extend time to serve its reply memorandum in further support of its motion for summary judgment [23-1] Defendant shall have until and including 2/3/06 by which it may serve its reply memorandum...signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (mh) |
Filing 23 Motion by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc to extend time to serve its reply memorandum in further support of its motion for summary judgment (dm) |
Filing 22 Response by Conny B. Hatch III motion for final summary judgment with memorandum of law in support [21-1] (dm) |
Filing 21 Motion by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc for final summary judgment with memorandum of law in support (dm) |
Filing 20 Order dismissing motion for emergency discovery instructions [18-1] signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 19 Order granting in part, denying in part motion to strike plaintiff's designation of expert witnesses [13-1], granting in part, denying in part motion to extend time for defendant to designate expert witnesses and incorporated memorandum of law [13-2] signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 18 Motion by Conny B. Hatch III for emergency discovery instructions (dm) |
Filing 17 Minutes of proceedings for Motions Hearing conducted on December 15, 2005 by Judge Sparks. Court Reporter: Lily Reznik (dm) |
Motion hearing held for the following motions: [13-1], [13-2] parties announce ready, statements and arguments of counsel heard, supplemental documents due in 15 days re: determination of mathematical error, written order forthcoming. (dm) |
Filing 16 Order Motion hearing motion to strike plaintiff's designation of expert witnesses [13-1] for 2:00 12/15/05, motion to extend time for defendant to designate expert witnesses and incorporated memorandum of law [13-2] for 2:00 12/15/05 signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 15 Response by Conny B. Hatch III motion to strike plaintiff's designation of expert witnesses [13-1], and notice of nonopposition to motion to extend time for defendant to designate expert witnesses and incorporated memorandum of law [13-2] (dm) |
Filing 14 Notice of filing of Initial Disclosures by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (dm) |
Filing 13 Motion by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc to strike plaintiff's designation of expert witnesses , to extend time for defendant to designate expert witnesses and incorporated memorandum of law (dm) |
Filing 12 Order reset docket call at 11:00 4/27/06 signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 11 Notice of filing of Rule 68 offer of Judgment to Plaintiff Conny B. Hatch, III by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (dm) |
Filing 10 Scheduling order setting Joining of parties, amending of pleadings on 1/20/06 Deadline for filing of all motions 3/29/06 Discovery cutoff 3/22/06 ; Docket Call set for 11:00 4/28/06 with a trial in the month of May 2006; Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 11/1/05 , termed motions signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 9 Notice of filing of signature correction to scheduling order by Conny B. Hatch III (dm) |
Filing 8 Ordered that the parties confer and submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration by August 26, 2005, pursuant to Local Rule CV-16(a). Signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Filing 7 Answer by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (dm) |
Filing 6 Order granting motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's original complaint [5-1] extending answer due until 6/30/05 for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc signed by Sam Sparks (mc2) |
Filing 5 Motion by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc to extend time to respond to plaintiff's original complaint (dm) |
Filing 4 Notice of attorney appearance for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc by Mark D. Temple (dm) |
Filing 3 Return of service executed as to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc on 5/17/05 (dm) |
Filing 2 Ordered that plaintiff shall file proof of service with the Clerk of this Court within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Failure to so respond will result in the dismissal of the entire cause for failure of plaintiff to prosecute or to comply... signed by Honorable Sam Sparks (dm) |
Summons issued for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (dm) |
Court file prepared and forwarded to Judge Sparks (tdk) |
Filing 1 Complaint filed. Filing Fee: $ 150.00 Receipt # 364132 (Pages: 6) (tdk) |
Case assigned to Honorable Sam Sparks (tdk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hatch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Conny B. Hatch, III | |
Represented By: | Mustafa Engin Derkunt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Mark D. Temple |
Represented By: | Melissa Jean Judd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.