Atmel Corporation et al v. AuthenTec, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Atmel Corporation, Atmel Switzerland, Atmel France and Atmel SARL
Defendant: AuthenTec, Inc.
Petitioner: Motion Computing, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv01029
Filed: December 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Austin Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: Motion to Quash
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING #1 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (jk, )
February 7, 2008 Filing 11 NOTICE of California District Court's Ruling on the Motions to Extend Discovery Deadlines and for Leave to Take Additional Depositions by Atmel Corporation, Atmel Switzerland, Atmel France, Atmel SARL re #10 Order (Zoll, Mitchell)
January 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER for Plaintiff to IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY this court of the California district court's rulings on its pending motions. re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Motion Computing, Inc.. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (jk, )
January 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Denise De Mory. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jk, )
January 3, 2008 CASE CONVERTED FROM MISCELLANEOUS TO CIVIL CASE. ALL FUTURE DOCKETING TO BE DONE IN CASE # 1:07-cv-1029-LY. (jk, )
January 3, 2008 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Atmel Corporation, Atmel Switzerland, Atmel France, Atmel SARL, re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Movant Motion Computing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 1 through 9)(Zoll, Mitchell)
January 3, 2008 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Karen C. Burgess for Denise De Mory on behalf of AuthenTec, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order order pro hac vice)(Burgess, Karen) Modified on 1/4/2008 (jk, ).
January 2, 2008 Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Quash by Motion Computing, Inc., Atmel Corporation, Atmel Switzerland, Atmel France, Atmel SARL. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zoll, Mitchell)
December 26, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Buccino). Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jk, )
December 21, 2007 Pro Hac Vice Fee Paid by Lisa S. Buccino; Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 420303. (jk, )
December 20, 2007 Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lisa S. Buccino on behalf of AuthenTec, Inc.. (jk, )
December 20, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Motion Computing, Inc.. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Andrew W. Austin. (jk, )
December 19, 2007 Filing 2 Letters/Correspondence to attorneys Kim and DeMory advising of non-admitted status. (mm5)
December 19, 2007 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash (Filing fee $39.00; receipt #420290) by Motion Computing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order; #2 Civil Cover Sheet and copy of receipt; #3 Declaration; #4 Declaration; #5 Exhibits A - C; #6 Exhibit D-1 - D-3; #7 Exhibit D-4 - D-6; #8 Exhibits E - F; #9 Exhibits G - J; #10 Exhibits K - N; #11 Exhibits O - S)(mm5)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atmel Corporation et al v. AuthenTec, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atmel Corporation
Represented By: Mitchell Forsyth Zoll
Represented By: Olivia M. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atmel Switzerland
Represented By: Mitchell Forsyth Zoll
Represented By: Olivia M. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atmel France
Represented By: Mitchell Forsyth Zoll
Represented By: Olivia M. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atmel SARL
Represented By: Mitchell Forsyth Zoll
Represented By: Olivia M. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AuthenTec, Inc.
Represented By: Denise M. De Mory
Represented By: Lisa S. Buccino
Represented By: Karen C. Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Motion Computing, Inc.
Represented By: Karen C. Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?