Enochs v. Lampasas County
Plaintiff: Clarence Enochs
Defendant: Lampasas County
Case Number: 1:2009cv00054
Filed: January 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Austin Office
County: Lampasas
Presiding Judge: Sam Sparks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER GRANTING 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and 40 Second Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING as Moot 34 Motion for Hearing; DISMISSING as Moot 30 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (mm5, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Enochs v. Lampasas County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarence Enochs
Represented By: Delta Sue Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lampasas County
Represented By: Enid Allyn Patterson Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?