Johnson v. Owens et al
| Darren Henry Johnson |
| Rissie Owens, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and C. Hooser |
| 1:2009cv00922 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Travis |
| Robert Pitman |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Rissie Owens, 1 Complaint filed by Darren Henry Johnson; recommending dismissal without prejudice claims against the TX Board of Pardons and Paroles, the TX Dept. of C riminal Justice, claims against defendant Owens in her official capacity for monetary damages, claims against defendant Hooser in his official capacit for monetary damages, plaintiff's request for transfer, and plaintiff's request for an im mediate parole review; further recommends dismissal without prejudice of claims against defendant Hooser in his individual capacity for failure to state a claim, dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's request to move his next parole review, and grant defendant Owens' motion for judgment on the pleadings which was converted to a motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (mc2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
