Rizk et al v. MYRM Holdings, L.L.C. et al
| Edward G Rizk, Fred E Rizk, Sylvia R Rizk, Rizk Interests, Ltd., Austin Properties LLC and Kenneth A Barfield |
| Randall Hibshman, MRYM Group, Ltd., MRYM Holdings, L.L.C., MRYM Holdings, Ltd. Co., MYRM Holdings, L.L.C., Kanti Bahl and Christopher L Blackwell |
| 1:2011cv00180 |
| March 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 80 Motion for Entry of Default, filed by J. Cary Gray, Edward G Rizk, Rizk Interests, Ltd., Sylvia R Rizk, 86 Motion to Compel, Motion for Sanctions, filed by J. Cary Gray, Kenneth A Barfield, Edward G Rizk, Rizk Int erests, Ltd., Sylvia R Rizk, Austin Properties LLC, 89 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by J. Cary Gray, Kenneth A Barfield, Edward G Rizk, Rizk Interests, Ltd., Sylvia R Rizk, Austin Properties LLC; ORDER DENYING 91 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, filed by MRYM Holdings, L.L.C., MYRM Holdings, L.L.C., MRYM Group, Ltd., Randall Hibshman, Christopher L Blackwell, Kanti Bahl, MRYM Holdings, Ltd. Co. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (jk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
