Amin-Akbari v. City of Austin et al
| Akbar Amin-Akbari |
| Noel Guerin, City of Austin, Texas, Brandon Bullock, Joseph Brown, John Doe Officers, Craig Smith and Russell Smith |
| 1:2013cv00472 |
| June 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 56 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 71 Motion to Amend Complaint; GRANTING 46 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; GRANTING 59 Motion to Exclude Expert Te stimony; MOOTING 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; MOOTING 81 Motion for Summary Judgment; MOOTING 86 Motion to Strike Motion for Summary Judgment; MOOTING 89 Motion to Supplement its Motion for Summary Judgment. Discovery will now close on 11/17/2014; Motions for Summary Judgment due by 12/16/2014; Responses due by 12/31/2014; Replies due by 1/7/2015. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (kkc)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 60 Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Reimbursement of Costs; DENYING 62 Cross Motion for Limited Stay of Discovery with Respect to Punitive Damages Only and Request for Expedited Ruling; GRANTING 64 Motion to Compel Discovery and Modify the Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (kkc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
