Innovative Communication Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Computing Systems, Inc.
| Innovative Communication Systems, Inc. |
| Innovative Computing Systems, Inc. |
| Innovative Communication Systems, Inc. |
| Innovative Computing Systems, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv01044 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the District Court DENY Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the District Court DENY Defendant's 48 Motion for Summary Judgment except as to Plainti ff's federal dilution claim, which the Plaintiff has abandoned. ORDER DENYING as MOOT Defendant's 36 Motion to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (klw) Modified on 1/30/2015 to add text (klw).
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 28 Motion to Expedite ruling on 13 Motion to Compel. ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Opposed 18 Motion for Leave to Extend Page Limit and for Time to File Response. ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendant's 13 Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Answer to Interrogatories. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (klw) Modified on 7/16/2014 to correct/add text (klw).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
