OCA-Greater Houston et al v. State of Texas et al
| Mallika Das and OCA-Greater Houston |
| Carlos Cascos, City of Round Rock, State of Texas and Williamson County Elections Department |
| 1:2015cv00679 |
| August 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 Voting Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 96 Motion for Modification of the 2018 Permanent Injunction and MOOTING 104 Motion for Hearing and 105 Motion to Expedite Hearing. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER GRANTING 87 OCAs Motion for Post-Judgment Attorneys' Fees, Costs, andExpenses. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER REVISING Injunction. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING 64 Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and Expenses. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ml)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING 61 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ml)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER, the Court ENJOINS the provisions of the Texas Election Code are inconsistent with the Voting Rights Act and SUPPLEMENTS its August 12th Order to incorporate the contents of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
