Gates v. Medtronic, Inc.
| Carolyn Greene Gates |
| Medtronic, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00726 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Dismiss ; DISMISSING #15 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE in Support, filed by Medtronic, Inc., re #15 MOTION to Stay Deadlines and Discovery filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Carolyn Greene Gates, re #15 MOTION to Stay Deadlines and Discovery filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Snapka, Kathryn) |
| Filing 18 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Carolyn Greene Gates. (Urquhart, Jack) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Pretrial Order Proposed Scheduling Order with Party Positions by Carolyn Greene Gates. (Urquhart, Jack) |
| Filing 16 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Medtronic, Inc.. (Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Deadlines and Discovery by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 14 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Carolyn Greene Gates. (Snapka, Kathryn) |
| Filing 13 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Medtronic, Inc.. (Ring, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Medtronic, Inc., re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Carolyn Greene Gates, re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Urquhart, Jack) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by atty Daniel L. Ring entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by atty Laura A. Babinsky entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Charles Stephen Kelley of Laura A. Babinsky ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-8309280) by on behalf of Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Charles Stephen Kelley of Daniel L. Ring ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-8309249) by on behalf of Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum in Support, filed by Medtronic, Inc., re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - PMA, #2 Exhibit 2 - PMA Supplement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Sprint Fidelis Approval Letter, #4 Exhibit 4 - Class 1 Device Recall, #5 Exhibit 5 - April 2011 Letter, #6 Exhibit 6 - FDA Q&A, #7 Exhibit 7 - FDA Statement)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Reset Deadlines: Medtronic, Inc. answer due 3/14/2016. (dm) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's answer or other responsive pleading is due on or before March 14, 2016. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aemp) Modified on 11/25/2015 to correct date (dm).
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carolyn Greene Gates. All Defendants. (Snapka, Kathryn) |
| Reset Deadlines: Medtronic, Inc. answer due 12/14/2015. (dm) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's answer or other responsive pleading is due on or before December 14, 2015. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aemp)
|
| Filing 4 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Medtronic, Inc.. (dm) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Carolyn Greene Gates. (Snapka, Kathryn) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Carolyn Greene Gates. (afd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-7712273). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Carolyn Gates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Snapka, Kathryn) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/20/2015 to flatten image) (afd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
