Walters v. Sentry Link, L.L.C.
Mark Walters |
Sentry Link, L.L.C. |
1:2016cv00383 |
March 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Austin Office |
Lee Yeakel |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Court GRANT Defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and to DISMISS this case WITH PREJUDICE. ORDER DENYING Walter's 21 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (klw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walters v. Sentry Link, L.L.C. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sentry Link, L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | Brian Hensley |
Represented By: | William Garrett Hicks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Walters | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.