Morgan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Caroline Morgan |
| Hon. Edith Brown Clement, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Office of the Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Hon. Edward C. Prado, Hon. Leslie H. Southwick, Hon. Sam Sparks, The UPS Store #1617, Travis County Clerk's Office, Travis County Sheriff and U.S. Marshals Service |
| 1:2016cv01290 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Andrew W. Austin |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Motion to Dismiss, filed by U.S. Marshals Service, Edith Brown Clement, Edward C. Prado, Office of the Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, Leslie H. Southwick, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Offi ce of the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Sam Sparks, 10 Motion to Dismiss filed by Travis County Sheriff, Travis County Clerk's Office, 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Caroline Morgan, 13 Motion to Stay filed by Caroline Morgan, 11 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Caroline Morgan. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (ml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
