Hitt v. Mclane et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Hitt
Defendant: Greg Hamilton, Marsha Mclane and Brian Thomas
Case Number: 1:2017cv00289
Filed: April 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Austin Office
Presiding Judge: Sam Sparks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 63 Motion to Amend; ORDER GRANTING Thomas and CCRS's 67 Motion to Supplement; ORDER GRANTING McLane's 65 , 74 Motions to Seal; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTING Thomas and CCRS's 66 Motion for SummaryJudgment; ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART McLane's [65-1] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTING Hitt's 90 Unopposed Motion for Continuance; ORDER CANC ELLING bench trial set for July 12, 2018; ORDER SETTING Docket Call for 10/26/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Sam Sparks, with trial in the month of November 2018; ORDER DISMISSING Hitt's 91 MOTION for Expedited Hearing; ORDER CANCELLING hearing set for 7/12/18 at 9:30. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (lt)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART and REJECTING IN PART Magistrate's 45 Report and Recommendations. ORDER DENYING as MOOT Hitt's 48 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. ORDER DENYING Hitt's 34 MOTION to Amend Complaint. ORDER GRANTING TCSO's 25 MOTION to Dismiss. ORDER GRANTING in PART/ DENYING in PART Thomas, TCCC, and CCRS's 11 Motion to Dismiss. ORDER GRANTING in PART/DENYING in PART McLane's 12 MOTION to Dismiss. ORDER DISMISSING without prejudice to re-filing Hitt's 43 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (lt)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Brian Thomas, Correct Care Recovery Solutions, LLC, Texas Civil Commitment Center, 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Marsha McLane, 43 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Jonathan Hitt, 25 Motion to Dismiss filed by Travis County Sheriff's Office, 34 Motion to Amend Complaint filed by Jonathan Hitt. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hitt v. Mclane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marsha Mclane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Hitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?