Davenport v. Diamond Resorts International et al
Jessica Davenport |
Zane NeSmith and Diamond Resorts International |
1:2017cv01015 |
October 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Austin Office |
Robert Pitman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Diamond Resorts International. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Filing Defendant's Designation of Expert Witnesses by Diamond Resorts International (Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Diamond Resorts International, Zane NeSmith filed by Jessica Davenport.(dm) |
Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint entered by Judge Robert Pitman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rg) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Witnesses by Jessica Davenport (Melton, John) |
Filing 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Diamond Resorts International. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Jessica Davenport. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Melton, John) |
Filing 12 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Diamond Resorts International. (Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Jessica Davenport. (Melton, John) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Selection and Trial set for 2/25/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman, Amended Pleadings due by 5/14/2018, Discovery due by 9/28/2018, Joinder of Parties due by 5/14/2018, Motions due by 10/29/2018. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert Pitman: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 1/17/2018 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Pamela Andasola.)(td) |
Filing 8 ADR Report Filed - CONSENT to Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) by Diamond Resorts International(Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 7 ORDER, ( Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/17/2018 at 09:40 AM before Judge Robert Pitman,). Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 6 Proposed Scheduling Order Joint Proposed Scheduling Order by Diamond Resorts International. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Crowson, Walker) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT of State Court Docket Sheet by Zane NeSmith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Wike, Christopher) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #3 Supplement (dm) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT State Court Docket by Zane NeSmith. (Wike, Christopher) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing the removing party to supplement the record with state court pleadings if they have not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (klw) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diamond Resorts International (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-10107930), filed by Diamond Resorts International. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet)(Crowson, Walker) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.