Price v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Arty Price |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 1:2018cv00557 |
| July 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Mark Lane |
| Robert Pitman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER for Service of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Arty Price and Directing Respondent to Answer. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
|
| Filing 5 Letter to Arty Price and Edward Marshall re: Case Assignment in Austin Division. (afd) |
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from Eastern District of Texas; Case Number 6:18-cv-00316. |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (afd) |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Western District of Texas Austin Division. (mll, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. The above-styled application for the writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED forthwith to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, for such other and further proceedings as that Court deems appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 07/02/18. (mll, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.]
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-42480 (mll, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.] |
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (mjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Arty Price. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibits)(mjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.] |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent form mailed to Petitioner. (mjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/5/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Price v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Arty Price | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Represented By: | Sarah Miranda Harp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
