Goldstar Investments, Ltd. et al v. Silverberg
| Goldstar Investments, Ltd., Hill Country Trust, Bedrock Funding Management and Bedrock Funding Management, LLC |
| FCI Capital LLC |
| Gary Martin |
| Stephen Blair Silverberg |
| 1:2018cv00635 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order DENYING #14 Intervenor FCI Capital LLC's Motion for Hearing on Motion to Remand entered by Judge Robert Pitman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Hearing re #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court , #9 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court by FCI Capital LLC, Stephen Blair Silverberg. (Breen, Sean) |
| Filing 13 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #11 Response in Opposition to Motion. (dm) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Bedrock Funding Management, LLC, re #9 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Bedrock Funding Management, LLC (Cleveland, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by FCI Capital LLC, Stephen Blair Silverberg, re #9 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Bedrock Funding Management, LLC and Motion to Strike (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit)(Breen, Sean) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Bedrock Funding Management, LLC, re #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Bedrock Funding Management, LLC (Cleveland, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court by Bedrock Funding Management, LLC. (Cleveland, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 ATTACHMENT Proposed Order to #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by FCI Capital LLC, Stephen Blair Silverberg. (Breen, Sean) |
| Filing 7 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by FCI Capital LLC, Stephen Blair Silverberg, re #5 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Bedrock Funding Management, LLC (Breen, Sean) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Silverberg's Third Amended Counterclaim & Third-Party Claims by Stephen Blair Silverberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Breen, Sean) |
| Filing 5 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by Bedrock Funding Management, LLC. (Cleveland, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENT by FCI Capital LLC, Stephen Blair Silverberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Breen, Sean) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so.Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 2 Report on Copyright sent to Register of Copyrights, along with a copy of the Complaint. (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Stephen Blair Silverberg. (cj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stephen Blair Silverberg (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11059034), filed by Stephen Blair Silverberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Breen, Sean) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2018: #4 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet) (cj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
