Inmobiliaria Buda, S. De R.L. De C.V. et al v. Emerald FL, LLC et al
| INMOBILIARIA BUDA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. and INMOBILIARIA DONA LUCHA, S. DE R.L. DE CV |
| OESK, LLC, Emerald FL, LLC, CLAUDIA IRENE RUIZ MAZARIEGOS, SANTIAGO SOLORZANO URETA, MARICELA NAVA ARZATE and ROBERTO APARICIO MORENO |
| 1:2018cv00639 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants OESK,LLC and Emerald FL, LLC and CLOSING this action. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER re #13 Notice of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL by Inmobiliaria Buda, S. De R.L. De C.V., Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha, S. De R.L. De CV (Rios, Jerry) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Inmobiliaria Buda, S. De R.L. De C.V., Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha, S. De R.L. De CV in writing as to why this action should not be dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 12/7/2018. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert Pitman: Initial Pretrial Conference held by phone on 11/27/2018. Written Order forthcoming. (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.) (Court Reporter Pamela Andasola.)(lt) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING Initial Pretrial Conference by phone for 11/27/2018 at 09:30 AM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Scheduling Order by Emerald FL, LLC, OESK, LLC. (O'Dens, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE Corporate Disclosure Statement by Emerald FL, LLC (O'Dens, David) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint . Attorney David M. O'Dens added to party Emerald FL, LLC(pty:dft) by Emerald FL, LLC.(O'Dens, David) |
|
Filing 6
Order for Joint Proposed Scheduling Order by 11/7/2018. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Francis N. Scollan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant OESK, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Francis N. Scollan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David M. O'Dens ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11164668) by on behalf of OESK, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(O'Dens, David) Modified on 8/27/2018 (lt). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so.Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by OESK, LLC. (O'Dens, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by OESK, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11063365), filed by OESK, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Dens, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2018: #2 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet) (cj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
