Frac Shack Inc. v. Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.
Plaintiff: Frac Shack Inc.
Defendant: Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00660
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Austin Office
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Diana M. Sangalli on behalf of Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.. Attorney Diana M. Sangalli added to party Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.(pty:dft) (Sangalli, Diana)
October 3, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas W. Sankey on behalf of Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc. (Sankey, Thomas)
September 26, 2018 Reset Deadline: Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc. answer due 10/11/2018. (lt)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #13 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Having considered the motion, the Court will GRANT the extension. Defendant's Answer or other responsive filing is due on or before October 11, 2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (DY)
September 25, 2018 Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING as unopposed #12 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's answer or other responsive filing is due on or before September 27, 2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (DY)
August 24, 2018 Reset Deadline: Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc. answer due 9/27/2018. (lt)
August 23, 2018 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert)
August 16, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Frac Shack Inc.. Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc. served on 8/7/2018, answer due 8/28/2018. (Wyde, Joshua)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Edward W. Goldstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Frac Shack Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Gary Fischman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Frac Shack Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
August 7, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua S. Wyde on behalf of Edward W. Goldstein ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11089914) by on behalf of Frac Shack Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wyde, Joshua)
August 6, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.. (cj)
August 6, 2018 Filing 6 Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, along with a copy of the Complaint. (cj)
August 6, 2018 Filing 5 Letter sent to Edward W. Goldstein for Frac Shack Inc. re: non-admitted status. (cj)
August 6, 2018 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Frac Shack Inc.. (Wyde, Joshua)
August 6, 2018 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Frac Shack Inc.. (Wyde, Joshua)
August 6, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua S. Wyde on behalf of Gary Fischman ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11087816) by on behalf of Frac Shack Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wyde, Joshua)
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11087516), filed by Frac Shack Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 10,029,906, #2 Exhibit 2 - Exemplary Public Evidence of Use Chart for the OctoFueler, #3 Exhibit 3 - Exemplary Public Evidence of Use Chart for AFD Onsite Refuelling [sic (British spelling)] System, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wyde, Joshua)
August 6, 2018 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj)
August 6, 2018 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Frac Shack Inc.. (cj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frac Shack Inc. v. Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frac Shack Inc.
Represented By: Edward W. Goldstein
Represented By: Joshua S. Wyde
Represented By: Gary J. Fischman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alaska Fuel Distributors Inc.
Represented By: Gilbert Andrew Greene
Represented By: Thomas W. Sankey
Represented By: Diana M. Sangalli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?