Stafford v. Manley et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone Stafford
Defendant: Officer FNU Neel and Brian Manley
Case Number: 1:2018cv00723
Filed: August 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Lane
Referring Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #10 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Per the Court's text order on October 3, 2018, the relief Plaintiff seeks has already been granted. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jjr)
October 9, 2018 Filing 9 Request for U.S. Marshals Service Expenses in Pauper Case. (dl)
October 4, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration by Tyrone Stafford. (dl)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order MOOTING #4 Plaintiff's Motion for all video evidence entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Per the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation #7 , Plaintiff's video evidence is deemed incorporated into the Complaint #1 . Plaintiff's Motion for all video evidence #4 is therefore MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jjr)
September 21, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to FNU Neel. (dl)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE MERITS OF THE CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (dl)
September 7, 2018 CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (dl)
September 5, 2018 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 Order for More Definite Statement by Tyrone Stafford. (dl)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - Statement due on or before September 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (dl)
August 23, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for All Video Evidence by Tyrone Stafford.. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (afd)
August 23, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tyrone Stafford.. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (afd)
August 23, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone Stafford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons). Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (afd)
August 23, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Tyrone Stafford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(afd)
August 23, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (afd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stafford v. Manley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer FNU Neel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Manley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Stafford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?