Desire, LLC v. The Cato Corporation et al
| Desire, LLC |
| The Cato Corporation and Does 1 through 10 |
| 1:2018cv00839 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Report on Copyright sent to Register of Copyrights. (lt) |
Filing 7
ORDER CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Desire, LLC (Cherry, Robert) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Desire, LLC. The Cato Corporation served on 10/8/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. (Cherry, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Cato Corporation. (afd) |
| Filing 3 Report on Copyright sent to Register of Copyrights with copy of Complaint. (afd) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Desire, LLC. (Cherry, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11303456), filed by Desire, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cherry, Robert) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Desire, LLC. (afd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
