Visible Connections, LLC v. Zoho Corporation
| Visible Connections, LLC |
| Zoho Corporation |
| 1:2018cv00859 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Zoho Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Powers, Matthew) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's deadline to file an answer or to otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and includes December 7, 2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Zoho Corporation answer due 12/7/2018. (lt) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Zoho Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT)(Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Visible Connections, LLC. Zoho Corporation served on 10/12/2018, answer due 11/2/2018. (Lee, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Zoho Corporation. (cj) |
| Filing 4 Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, along with a copy of the Complaint. (cj) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Visible Connections, LLC. (Lee, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Visible Connections, LLC. (Lee, Jennifer) (Main Document 2 replaced and flattened on 10/10/2018) (cj). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement Against Zoho Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11324884), filed by Visible Connections, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 6,665,392, #2 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 7,284,203, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Jennifer) (Attachment 3 replaced and flattened on 10/10/2018) (cj). |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Visible Connections, LLC. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Visible Connections, LLC v. Zoho Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zoho Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Powers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Visible Connections, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Tatum Lee |
| Represented By: | Cabrach J. Connor |
| Represented By: | Kevin S. Kudlac |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
