Wardle v. Terrell State Hospital et al
| Randal Wardle |
| U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Central Market, Austin City Police, H.E.B., Travis County Sheriffs, U.T. Health Science Center at Tyler, State Troopers and Terrell State Hospital |
| 1:2018cv01009 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Andrew W Austin |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Randal Wardle. (lt) |
| Filing 5 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt for magistrate #3 Report and Recommendations, as to Randal Wardle. (lt) |
| Filing 4 Copy of #3 Report and Recommendations sent via CMRRR, as to Randal Wardle. (lt) |
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Randal Wardle. ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Randal Wardle. Service to be withheld pending the District Court's review of the recommendations. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (lt)
|
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin. (lt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randal Wardle.. Motions referred to Judge Andrew W. Austin. (afd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Randal Wardle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(afd) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin. (afd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
