Adams v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
| Billy Adams |
| Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
| 1:2018cv01095 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Billy Adams (Butler, Dorothy) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF regarding #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Moore, Jesse) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Moore, Jesse) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Chase shall file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before February 5, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dg)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Chase Bank USA, N.A. answer due 2/5/2019. (dm) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Second) by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Jesse) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Chase Bank USA, N.A. answer due 1/29/2019. (td) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint is due on or before January 29, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(dg)
|
| Filing 6 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Moore, Jesse) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Jesse) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Billy Adams. Chase Bank USA, N.A. served on 12/18/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (Butler, Dorothy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (afd) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Billy Adams. (afd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT (Filing fee Paid $ 400, Receipt #.0542-11564075). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Billy Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Butler, Dorothy) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Billy Adams. (Butler, Dorothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chase Bank USA, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Tyner Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billy Adams | |
| Represented By: | Dorothy Kathleen Butler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
