Bruno v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Daniel Bruno |
| Mark Hassan, Geneva Financial Services, LLC, Kamies Elhouty, Geneva Motors, Inc., Andy Mitchell, Equifax Information Services, LLC, John McGinley, REBS Supply Inc., Geneva Financial Services, Inc. and Robert McGinley |
| RBM World Enterprises, LLC |
| 1:2018mc00774 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
|
|
Text Order DISMISSING #1 Motion to Compel entered by Judge Mark Lane. the Motion is dismissed pursuant to the parties' stipulation at Dkt. #11. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION regarding Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 1) by Daniel Bruno, RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Smith, Brian) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order by RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Confidentiality and Protective Order)(Smith, Brian) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Mark Lane. The response is due on or before October 26, 2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks)
|
| Filing 9 Corrected Proposed Order re #8 Third Agreed Motion to Enlarge and Extend Time to Respond, filed by RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Smith, Brian) Modified on 10/23/2018 (lt). |
| Filing 8 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 MOTION to Compel Agreed by RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Brian) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING WITH MODIFICATION #6 Second Agreed Motion to Enlarge and Extend Time to Respond. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 MOTION to Compel Agreed by RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Brian) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Mark Lane. The response is due 10/5/18. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks)
|
| Filing 5 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 MOTION to Compel by RBM World Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE re #1 MOTION to Compel Corrected Certificate of Service by Keith Wier on behalf of Daniel Bruno (Wier, Keith) Modified on 9/18/2018 (lt). |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Daniel Bruno. (Wier, Keith) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/17/2018 to flatten image) (lt) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #1 MOTION to Compel filed by Daniel Bruno. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. Referral Magistrate Judge: Mark Lane. (lt)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel (#100034008 Filing Fee $47.00) by Daniel Bruno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Receipt, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(cj) |
| Case assigned Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
