Edwards et al v. National Domestic Violence Hotline
| Anitra Edwards and Tatiana Shams |
| National Domestic Violence Hotline d/b/a The Hotline and National Domestic Violence Hotline |
| 1:2019cv00031 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Daniel A. Cordova added to party National Domestic Violence Hotline(pty:dft) by National Domestic Violence Hotline.(Cordova, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to National Domestic Violence Hotline. (afd) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Anitra Edwards. Amended to Include Plaintiffs' Attorney information. (Guerrero, Marco) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Anitra Edwards, Tatiana Shams. (afd) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Anitra Edwards. (Guerrero, Marco) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11644241), filed by Anitra Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Guerrero, Marco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
