Ellenburg v. 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: Chris Ellenburg
Defendant: Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv00174
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2019 Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter mailed to Cory S. Reed for Defendant 3M Company re: non-admitted status. (cj)
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #5 Defendant's Motion to Stay entered by Judge Robert Pitman. This matter is STAYED until 15 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues a Conditional Transfer Order in the pending matter, pursuant to the Court's ruling in MDL 2885, In re: 3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation. Defendant's deadline to file an answer or otherwise responsive pleading in the present matter is extended to 15 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues a Conditional Transfer Order pertaining to this matter. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jjr)
April 4, 2019 Filing 5 Agreed MOTION to Stay of Proceedings Pending Issuance of Conditional Transfer Orders by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Mennucci, William)
February 22, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC. (cj)
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letters mailed to Rodrigo R. de Llano, Paul Danziger, Erin Rogiers, and Meredith D. Stratigopoulos for Plaintiff Chris Ellenburg re: non-admitted status. (cj)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Chris Ellenburg. (Sanford, Shelly)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11798424), filed by Chris Ellenburg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Shelly) (Attachment 1 replaced and flattened on 2/22/2019) (cj).
February 22, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Chris Ellenburg. (cj)
February 22, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellenburg v. 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aearo Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Otto
Represented By: William L. Mennucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Ellenburg
Represented By: Mikal C. Watts
Represented By: Francisco Guerra, IV
Represented By: Shelly Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?