Moorhead v. Klene
Jordan Moorhead |
Elizabeth Jacobson Klene |
1:2019cv00203 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Lee Yeakel |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order by Jordan Moorhead. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mares, Jorge) |
Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Dan Worthington. (afd) |
Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER to #2 Complaint . Attorney Sarah Ann Nicolas added to party Elizabeth Jacobson Klene(pty:dft) by Elizabeth Jacobson Klene.(Nicolas, Sarah) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jordan Moorhead. Elizabeth Jacobson Klene served on 3/11/2019, answer due 4/1/2019. (Mares, Jorge) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Elizabeth Jacobson Klene. (cj) |
Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jordan Moorhead. (cj) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11834283.) filed by Jordan Moorhead. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mares, Jorge) Modified on 3/4/2019 to add receipt # (tr). |
Filing 1 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Jordan Moorhead. (Mares, Jorge) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.