Clark McCarthy Healthcare Partners II v. W&W-AFCO Steel, LLC as successor in interest to Hirschfeld Steel Group, LP et al
| Clark McCarthy Hospital Partners II |
| Midwest Steel, Inc., W&W-AFCO Steel, LLC and Hirschfeld Steel Group, LP |
| 1:2019cv00449 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hirschfeld Steel Group, LP, Midwest Steel, Inc., W&W-AFCO Steel, LLC. (dl) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Clark McCarthy Hospital Partners II. for W&W-AFCO Steel, LLC as successor in interest to Hirschfeld Steel Group, LP; Hirschfeld Steel Group, LP; and Midwest Steel, Inc. (Baldwin, George) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/26/2019 to flatten image) (dl). |
| Filing 1 INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12046192), filed by Clark McCarthy Hospital Partners II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baldwin, George) Modified on 4/26/2019 to update initiating document type (dl). |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
