Epstein et al v. 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC
| Marilyn Roth Epstein and Beit Nes, LLC |
| 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC |
| 1:2019cv00495 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Hemingson, Tate) |
| Reset Deadlines: 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC answer due 7/5/2019. (dm) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #8 Amended Complaint by 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hemingson, Tate) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint on or before July 5, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dg)
|
|
Text Order MOOTING #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's motion is MOOT in light of Plaintiff's amended complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dg)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Marilyn Roth Epstein, re #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC (Minerve, James) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants amending, filed by Marilyn Roth Epstein. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Marilyn Epstein's Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Minerve, James) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #7 Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Response is due on or before June 14, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (DY)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Marilyn Roth Epstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Minerve, James) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Strike or Expunge Lis Pendens by 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order)(Hemingson, Tate) |
| Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Hemingson, Tate) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Complete State Court Pleadings by 5AIF Sycamore 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Hemingson, Tate) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet (JS 44) by 5AIF SYCAMORE 2, LLC. (Hemingson, Tate) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 5AIF SYCAMORE 2, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12085984), filed by 5AIF SYCAMORE 2, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Filings Part 1, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Filings Part 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hemingson, Tate) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
