Ross v. Health and Human Services Commission
Plaintiff philip martin ross, Shelley Thomson and Philip Martin Ross |
Health and Human Services Commission, Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Anne M. Angerer |
1:2019cv00685 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER Granting #8 Motion to Seal, or, in the Alternative, Redact Previously Filed Documents. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Philip Martin Ross, Shelley Thomson (Ross, Philip) |
Filing 11 ATTACHMENT Proposed Order to #9 Response to Motion, #10 Deficiency Notice by Philip Martin Ross, Shelley Thomson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit redacted 1st Am. Complaint)(Ross, Philip) |
Filing 10 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #9 Response to Motion, (afd) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Philip Martin Ross, Shelley Thomson, re #8 Opposed MOTION to Seal or Redact Previously Filed Documents filed by Defendant Health and Human Services Commission, Defendant Anne M. Angerer, Defendant Texas Health and Human Services Commission not Opposed to Redacting the previously filed document (Ross, Philip) |
Filing 8 Opposed MOTION to Seal or Redact Previously Filed Documents by Anne M. Angerer, Health and Human Services Commission, Texas Health and Human Services Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Lyles, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Philip Martin Ross as to All Defendants. (Ross, Philip) |
Set Answer Deadlines: 10/21/2019. (afd) |
Filing 6 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Anne M. Angerer amending #3 Amended Complaint,., filed by Philip Martin Ross, Shelley Thomson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(dm) (Main Document 6 replaced on 8/29/2019) (dm). |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave to file 2d Amended Verified Original Complaint and exhibits by Philip Martin Ross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2d Am Complaint, #2 Exhibit Order Appointing Guardian, #3 Exhibit Motion for New Trial, #4 Exhibit Motion for TRO, #5 Exhibit TRO)(Ross, Philip) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin. (dl) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Philip Martin Ross. (dl) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT Corrected Caption against Health and Human Services Commission amending #1 Complaint,., filed by philip martin ross. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Order Appointing Guardian, #3 Exhibit Motion TRO, #4 Exhibit Motion New Trial, #5 Exhibit Order TRO)(Ross, Philip) |
Filing 2 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by philip martin ross. (Ross, Philip) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12315473), filed by philip martin ross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Appointing Guardian, #2 Exhibit Motion TRO, #3 Exhibit Motion New Trial, #4 Exhibit Order TRO)(Ross, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.