Studzinski v. City of Austin et al
Neal Studzinski |
Joseph Lorett, Lewis Holland, Karl Krycia, City of Austin, Richard Anthony Ross, Christopher Taylor and John Bundick |
1:2019cv00709 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Lee Yeakel |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Rule 7a Reply by John Bundick, City of Austin, Lewis Holland, Karl Krycia, Joseph Lorett, Richard Anthony Ross, Christopher Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Edwards, Christine) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to John Bundick, City of Austin, Lewis Holland, Karl Krycia, Joseph Lorett, Richard Anthony Ross, Christopher Taylor. (lt) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Neal Studzinski. (Christensen, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12350508), filed by Neal Studzinski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Christensen, Daniel) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Neal Studzinski. (dl) |
Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.