Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC et al v. City of Kyle, Texas
| Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC and Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC |
| City of Kyle, Texas |
| 1:2019cv00734 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, re #25 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Kyle, Texas (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 27
ORDER RESETTING HEARING re #22 Order Setting Hearing on Motion. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Motion Hearing reset for 10/2/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman re: #25 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss , #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (cj). |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, re #25 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Kyle, Texas (Kroger, William) |
| Filing 25 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss by City of Kyle, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sept 9 2019 unsigned ordinance, #2 Exhibit B - Disposition Table)(Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 24 Subject to its Motion to Dismiss, ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City of Kyle, Texas.(Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, re #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Plaintiff Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC (Kroger, William) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion for Hearing. Hearing set for 9/17/2019 01:00 PM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant City of Kyle, Texas (Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 20 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, re #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Plaintiff Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC (Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Plaintiff Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC (Kroger, William) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant City of Kyle, Texas (Kroger, William) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant shall respond to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on or before September 5, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sw)
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by City of Kyle, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment)(Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, re #13 MOTION for Hearing filed by Plaintiff Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Plaintiff Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC (Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Plaintiff Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC (Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Kyle, Texas. (Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Hearing by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Setting Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment)(Kroger, William) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Bill Kroger, #2 Exhibit 2 - Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Chart)(Kroger, William) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Defendant's deadline to file an answer or to otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and includes August 20, 2019. Its deadline to respond to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is extended to and include August 27, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
| City of Kyle, Texas answer on or before 8/20/2019. (cj) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Extension of time to respond to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by City of Kyle, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time)(Powers, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC. City of Kyle, Texas served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019. (Kroger, William) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Setting Hearing on #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction : Motion Hearing set for 9/17/2019 01:00 PM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney James H. Barkley for Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC,James H. Barkley for Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of Kyle, Texas. (cj) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Kroger, William) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Kroger, William) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by William Karl Kroger for James Barkley ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12377999) by on behalf of Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kroger, William) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Kroger, William) |
| Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter mailed to James H. Barkley for Plaintiffs Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC et al re: non-admitted status. (cj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12377486), filed by Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC, Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kroger, William) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
