Clement v. The United States of America et al
| Stacie Judice Schott Clement, Stacie Schott Clement, Stacie Clement Judice and Clement Judice |
| The State of Texas, The Texas Health and Human Commission, The United States of America and The Texas Health and Human Services (Commission) |
| 1:2019cv00802 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to rescind in forma pauperis by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Certification of the Electronic Record on Appeal has been accepted by the 5th Circuit re #10 Notice of Appeal. Attorneys are advised that they may now download the EROA from the Fifth Circuit CM/ECF site by following these instructions #here (lt) |
| Filing 14 Letter/Correspondence from Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. Filing fee $505. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out #Form DKT-13 (Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (td) |
| Filing 12 Letter/Correspondence from Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Filing 11 Letter/Correspondence from Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. Filing fee $505. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out #Form DKT-13 (Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (td) |
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #3 Report and Recommendations. Clement's complaint (Dkt. 1 ), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (td) |
| Filing 6 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt for magistrate report and recommendations re #3 Report and Recommendations as to Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (afd) |
| Filing 5 Letter/Correspondence from Stacie Judice Schott Clement. (afd) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Receipt of #3 Report and Recommendations (afd) |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Stacie Judice Schott Clement, GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stacie Judice Schott Clement. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (afd) |
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (afd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stacie Judice Schott Clement.. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
