Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Vanengelenhoven
Plaintiff: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Defendant: John A. Vanengelenhoven
Case Number: 1:2019cv00821
Filed: August 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Referring Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
September 25, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the docket of the Honorable Robert Pitman, United States District Judge, for all purposes. Judge Lee Yeakel no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
September 12, 2019 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ramirez, Mauro)
September 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cynthia Reba Levin-Moulton on behalf of John A. Vanengelenhoven. Attorney Cynthia Reba Levin-Moulton added to party John A. Vanengelenhoven(pty:dft) (Levin-Moulton, Cynthia)
August 30, 2019 Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Service returned by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.. John A. Vanengelenhoven served on 8/24/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Ramirez, Mauro) Modified on 8/30/2019 (lt).
August 30, 2019 Notice of Correction: re #5 Acknowledgment of Service Returned. The document was incorrectly filed as Acknowledgment of Service instead of as Summons Returned Executed, which set an incorrect answer date. The clerk has modified your docket entry and revised the answer deadline. (lt)
August 20, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John A. Vanengelenhoven. (dl)
August 20, 2019 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.. (Ramirez, Mauro)
August 20, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.. (Ramirez, Mauro)
August 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12501065), filed by Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramirez, Mauro) (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/20/2019 to flatten image) (dl).
August 20, 2019 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin. (dl)
August 20, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Vanengelenhoven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John A. Vanengelenhoven
Represented By: Cynthia Reba Levin-Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Represented By: Mauro Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?