Sidbury v. Dun & Bradstreet Emerging Businesses Corp. et al
| Jeanolee Sidbury |
| Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp. and Dun & Bradstreet Emerging Businesses Corp. |
| 1:2019cv00865 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jeanolee Sidbury as to All Defendants. (Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Consent to Join Form for JEANOLEE SIDBURY by Jeanolee Sidbury (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join form for JEANOLEE SIDBURY)(Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Jeanolee Sidbury. (Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12562278). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Jeanolee Sidbury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scalise, Charles) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jeanolee Sidbury. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
